Originally Posted by Crisstti
Uhm, no, he doesn't have to. He has won plenty. Really, how long does it have to be without winning titles on a certain surface (despite very good results, BTW) to say that someone has to "prove himself" over again?.
But Federer beating Nadal is something very (very, very,...) important, he would have to "prove he can win a match" against Nadal, right?