View Single Post
Old 10-08-2012, 01:26 PM   #57
Crisstti's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Chile
Posts: 7,152

Originally Posted by RF20Lennon View Post
wasnt a GS. That was my point back then in the 2004-2006 era except for RG it was almost impossible to beat fed in a GS
He was lucky Rafa wasn't still good enough off clay, that's all

Originally Posted by Mike Sams View Post
He doesn't have to prove himself OVER again. But he certainly has to IMPROVE though, don't you think? Because other players are improving including Djokovic and Murray who are both younger than Nadal. Hence Nadal has to improve if he's going to keep up with these younger players who are improving their game and getting physically stronger each season.
He's improved against Djokovic, which is what he was needing. He has continually beaten Murray on slams.
We will have to see what his level is now though.

Originally Posted by Sartorius View Post
Pretty much.

But Federer beating Nadal is something very (very, very,...) important, he would have to "prove he can win a match" against Nadal, right?
Sorry, not sure what is your point...
""If doesn't exist in sport. If never comes. You have to do it" Nadal
Crisstti is offline   Reply With Quote