View Single Post
Old 10-09-2012, 08:26 AM   #13
abmk
G.O.A.T.
 
abmk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: India
Posts: 14,762
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiki View Post
You still dazzed and frustrated that Kodes won 2 RG to your beloved Roger 1?
no, not at all Kodes was the luckiest player ever and had 3 of the weakest draws possible to win his slams ...

Most ( well all people - Kodestards) know federer is a superior claycourter to Kodes by some distance

Quote:
Originally Posted by kiki View Post
Laver 3 Slams to Roger 0?
he won one slam ( the amateur one doesn't count ) and didn't dominate as much as federer did over a 4 year stretch ( 2004-2007 )


Quote:
Originally Posted by kiki View Post
Sampras, Borg and Gonzales would laugh at Federer ridiculous opposition forlong and long years while they played strong eras?
what they'd laugh at is your dumb suggestion that this era is weak ....... and most of your other posts here ...

Kodes being on the same level as Vines
federer being in the 3rd tier of greats

etc etc ...
abmk is offline   Reply With Quote