Originally Posted by Prisoner of Birth
You do realize one could make the same argument against Nadal on Clay, right? And it's not like he beat Borg. Or even Kuerten.
You are wrong about that. Ferrer would have dominated the 90s claycourt scene. BTW, if Rafa was in the 90s he'd dominate clay even MORE. The 2000s are the fastest claycourt period in history. Clay has never been faster than it is right now. Remember 2011? Federer was considered a huge chance to beat Rafa because everybody pointed out how fast the clay was, faster than ever.