View Single Post
Old 10-10-2012, 12:14 PM   #20
tennis_pro
G.O.A.T.
 
tennis_pro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Germany, Munich
Posts: 15,202
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 90's Clay View Post
How that exactly? To beat a 30 year old Sampras (7-5 in the 5th) who was done on grass and would retire the year after?.

Not to mention Pete won ZERO titles in 2001 and had a 35-16 record. Which was freakin horrid for his standards. One match isn't much of a sample size.. Especially when one guy was playing above his years, and the other guy's career was winding down
I guess that's just another reason why Fed>>>>Sampras, Fed would never be owned on a consistent basis by noobs like Sampras was in his later years.
__________________
Just shows you how pointless H2H's are. Nadal beat Fed but in the end it meant jack, they both walked away with nothing. It's about winning titles.
tennis_pro is offline   Reply With Quote