Originally Posted by Mustard
So, no objective, physical evidence, just more smears against a cyclist who has never failed a drugs test. Joseph McCarthy would be so proud of the ruthlessness of this witch hunting.
It is not a "witch hunt" because there appears to be very substantial evidence against Armstrong.
I'm pretty sure that the sworn testimony of 15 other riders would be considered pretty strong evidence in any court of law.
You really think all those riders are perjuring themselves just to get Armstrong? That makes very little sense.