Originally Posted by NadalAgassi
9 for Nadal is delusional. He may not even win 9 now even against a clay court field much weaker than the 80s and 90s. Now if it were the 70s clay field minus Borg I would agree with 9.
Without Nadal I think Federer could win 2, but wouldnt make finals as consistently as he does today. Without Nadal plus the deeper field probably 0.
Djokovic about the same, if we are talking about his projected entire career (not just his career one which is only halfway through as it is).
I think I misinterpreted the question. The OP probably meant how they'd do if they alone
were playing then, not if all 5 of them were playing back then.
ETA : Wait, they didn't even mention Nadal? I must be dozing off.