Originally Posted by 5263
One of your better questions!
I did it because I knew this is where we would end up and
you would either say what you did, YOU confirming what we have been told on this issue,
or possibly you miss that point, blinded by the usual claimed trust of any big name
like Smith, and we could just deal with the good point Stan make about what is
happening in Fed's game today, with the wt of Stan on the issue.
Either way you went with it, if forces you to deal with the misinfo in your posts.
This way, you had to deal with both of them
So you said somebody was right even though he was wrong because I would come back and point it out and you were waiting for it? Am I that important?
It just doesn't make any sense. Why not just keep it simple?