View Single Post
Old 10-11-2012, 11:15 PM   #175
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 675

Originally Posted by BreakPoint View Post
If that's the case, why are there so many threads saying that Federer needs to switch to a bigger racquet if he wants to keep winning? Obviously, a lot of people think a bigger racquet makes it easier for you to win than a smaller one, right? So why do people think Federer would play better if he switched to Murray's or Djokovic's or Nadal's racquet?

During the wood era, I NEVER heard anyone say that McEnroe would win more if he switched from his wood racquet to Borg's wood racquet or Gerulaitis' wood racquet. Why? Because everyone knew that they were all pretty much the same and didn't give any player an advantage over another. That's obviously no longer true today. Or else why do so many people here keep buying or trying new racquets and new strings all the time? Obviously, they feel they gain an advantage with them.

Because he plays BETTER with a bigger racquet.

Because the world is progressing, that's why things never happened before happens now.
Readers is offline   Reply With Quote