View Single Post
Old 10-13-2012, 07:13 PM   #509
Mustard
Talk Tennis Guru
 
Mustard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 22,150
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bartelby View Post
Yes, he is not asserting his innocence anymore because he fears further perjuring himself if he has to give evidence under oath.

That's the legal advice.
The USADA's dossier is based on circumstantial evidence and the testimonies of plea bargained cyclists or those with an axe to grind against Armstrong. The dossier contains zero objective, physical evidence. What's scary is how many people have just bought it all at face value, and don't even question how someone who survived metastasised cancer, not only came back to professional cycling and won 7 Tour de Frances titles, but also did it whilst being doped up to the eyeballs (and never getting banned for a positive test), whilst also pushing drugs onto other cyclists.

If Armstrong did all that the USADA allege, then his powers would be at ridiculous levels. Not even Napoleon Bonaparte's escape from exile on Elba to reconquer power in France is on that level.

Last edited by Mustard : 10-13-2012 at 07:16 PM.
Mustard is offline   Reply With Quote