View Single Post
Old 10-14-2012, 05:47 AM   #519
Mustard
Talk Tennis Guru
 
Mustard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 22,113
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FrisbeeFool View Post
What additional evidence would you need to see to be convinced that Lance doped. Would you need to see a picture of him in the act of administering banned substances, while he held up a copy of the days newspaper. There's mountains of evidence chronicling his history of doping. His team had a history of institutionalized doping, that he played a major role in.
It makes Armstrong sound like something out of The Godfather. All the evidence is circumstantial and based on the testimonies of cyclists who have been offered plea bargains or have with an axe to grind. Why do you take such evidence as fact when blackmail is involved? The federal investigation into all this was dropped.
Mustard is offline   Reply With Quote