Originally Posted by djokovic2008
Definetly think Raonic would have won a slam in the 90s, Isner would have a shot his ground game just as good if not better than gorans.
They both have better ground game than Goran, and Isner's fh has vastly improved(his monster serve + fh put away has been a great one-two punch). Raonic began to develop some consistent from the baseline. I don't see no reason why they wouldn't win a slam in the 90s, especially when the conditions are suitable for big server.