Originally Posted by Dan Lobb
By the time Kramer published his book in 1978, he no longer cared about promoting one player or the other.
I'm not so sure. Maybe not about "promoting," but Kramer does seem to have a few idiosyncratic opinions occasionally that serve to elevate or diminish certain players in the history of the game.
(The only common thread I can detect among them is that it appears
that Kramer wished to diminish the reputations/achievements of those who might be compared with himself.)
Step 1: Refute content of argument. If that fails, Step 2: question intelligence of the author. If that fails, Step 3: demonize the messenger.
Last edited by hoodjem; 10-16-2012 at 12:47 PM.