View Single Post
Old 10-22-2012, 01:27 PM   #618
Talk Tennis Guru
Mustard's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Cwmbran, Wales
Posts: 24,898

Originally Posted by sureshs View Post
UCI accepting USADA decision doesn't mean the allegations are true.
It means that the UCI have caved in to outside pressure.

Originally Posted by pushing_wins View Post
the reverse is also true.

a non-conviction doesnt mean he is not guilty
Except that it's supposed to be innocent until proven guilty, not the other way round. Armstrong shouldn't have to prove his innocence. The USADA case is based on plea bargains, people with grudges, and all sorts of purely circumstantial stuff. They say that Armstrong is some sort of drugs mule and everyone is just supposed to believe it.

Last edited by Mustard; 10-22-2012 at 01:33 PM.
Mustard is offline   Reply With Quote