View Single Post
Old 10-29-2012, 12:56 PM   #30
kiki's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 18,402

Originally Posted by NadalAgassi View Post
Of course he would lose some slams from 60-62 in that scenario, but he would gain many more slams in 64-67 when he would have been the dominant player and won most of them, than he would have lost from 60-62. All that is already taken into account when people do their estimates, and the estimates of virtually all experts have Laver, Rosewall, Gonzales all winning 18 or more.
Plus he did not have a YEC or WCT final like Federer had so, take all Fed YEC titles when comparing, please
"Read my lips.No more taxes" RR in 1980
kiki is offline   Reply With Quote