Originally Posted by krosero
OK, let's play this game your style.
2008 AO – mono cost him this Slam.
2008 Wimbledon -- tons of wasted break point opportunities
2009 AO – Blew this one, really should have won. Only his mental block with Nadal cost him the match.
2009 USO – Let this one slip away
2005 AO – match point against Safin slipped away, would have won if not for blisters and a bad back.
That would actually have given him 22 Slams and left Nadal with only 9. Oh well.
LOL at the "your game" comments. I was just giving my opinion in what the spirit of this thread is for. You are likewise entitled your own opinion. As it is I disagree with some of those. There was nothing more he could have done to win the 2005 Australian Open, he played his best and still lost. Novak was flat out too good at the 2008 Australian Open, he would have beaten Federer no matter what.