Originally Posted by zagor
Convenient that the current members of top 4 are Fed's "main rivals" (despite all of them being 5-6 years younger) when it is to his detriment (H2H records) but when it comes to comparing # of slams (in which Nadal currently trails and most of his fans don't believe will reach), time spent as #1 etc. it's Fed weak era this, weak era that.
If Fed's main rivals are the same as Nadal's then the weak era excuse doesn't hold water when comparing the two, no?
Well, he ends up being compared to them because the ones his own age are too weak, relatively speaking.