View Single Post
Old 11-12-2012, 11:28 PM   #69
joeri888
G.O.A.T.
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 13,048
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by veroniquem View Post
Surfaces are perfect the way they are. Funny how every time Fed loses, the surface is at fault. How about: the player is at fault? (Revolutionary concept, I know)
If Fed wants to be a top player, he has to be able to play on all surfaces. No excuses.
You make that up. He nowhere blames the surface for the loss. However, just compare this surface to the one in 2006 and 07 in Shanghai and tell me that it's the same. The only reason you think the surfaces are fine is because it suits your buddy. Just imagine in 5 years when both are retired. Do we only want defensive tennis with zero reward for offensive plays? No we don't. And there's n historical argument to back up that the surfaces are fine. They've never been this way and never should be. I am already over Fed's loss and I can actually cope with slow surfaces as long as Roger plays. The problem lies AFTER Roger. When Roger's retired. Who'll come to the net? The guy chasing down a dropshot to get passed that's who, and nobody else.
joeri888 is offline   Reply With Quote