View Single Post
Old 11-14-2012, 12:33 AM   #24
Prisoner of Birth
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,810

Originally Posted by lendlmac View Post
Thans Gizo!

No one is saying lendl is better than roger....but if Grand Slams did NOT put both their careers next to each other.....Lendl would have kicked rogers a s s upband down the courts...

Also Roger Federer has NEVER ever played the fast courts of the 80's and never will. All the tennis tournaments back in the 80s played waaay far much faster than any current player has even tried....AO was faster...W was faster...FO was faster and USO was faster....and the racquets were far inferior and smaller than todays tech....

So simply remove GS from the equation.....Pretend they didnt exist....Lendls career blows Federers career into the weeds... fact. Just saying...
If Slams didn't exist Federer would have played(and would be playing) all the Masters 1000/500/250 tournaments around and won most of them. You're incredibly dense and deluded with the argument you're making.
Prisoner of Birth is offline   Reply With Quote