Past prime Federer is doing better than a pre-prime Federer. During his early year, he was consistently losing to Hewitt, Nalbandian, Henman, Agassi, etc. I know he beat 4 times defending Sampras at Wimbledon in 01 but he wasn't a slam materials yet, and not in the top 5, let alone reaching #1. However, past prime Fed today who is facing Nadal/Nole/Murray is doing much better than teenage Fed.
When you think about it, Hewitt/Safin/Agassi/Nalbandian and company get slighted when comparing to the top players today.
RF 17(4-1-7-5)-6-5-23-81-302, RN 14(1-9-2-2)-0-3-27-64-141, Sampras 14(2-0-7-5)-5-6-11-64-286