View Single Post
Old 11-14-2012, 02:12 PM   #10
Candide
Semi-Pro
 
Candide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 718
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NadalAgassi View Post
Laughable. So Roddick, Hewitt, Nalbandian, Ljubicic, and teenaged ****** player still on all but clay version of Nadal (the field Federer set all his record marks, had the vast majority of his #1 weeks against, and most of his slams against) is a tougher field than McEnroe, Wilander, Becker, Edberg, and Connors. TMF must be the only person on the planet, including the strongest of the *******s who believes Federer's era had the strongest competition ever.
You left out Safin, Philippoussis, Gonzales, Sampras, Murray, Djokovic and an older, stronger Nadal. Looks like a pretty strong field to me. Far tougher than the names you've mentioned. I think Gonzales alone would have murdered Wilander and Connors let alone Safin. The game has moved on. Only Becker and Edberg and McEnroe would have a chance against the modern players. The rest were just too physically small and weak.
__________________
“There is no best. There is just the discussion of who is best. Federer, he will always be in the first part of such a discussion.” Rino Tommasi
Candide is online now   Reply With Quote