Originally Posted by Agassifan
Fed is going to end up with more Slams (for sure)
The problem with your post is....Talk Tennis has ALWAYS been "sure" yet has a history of never being able to predict what happens each year.
At the end of 2007 it was believed that Federer would continue to dominate. Instead, Nadal won Roland Garros, Wimbledon and Olympic Gold in 2008.
At the end of 2008 it was believed that Nadal would continue to dominate.
Instead, Federer won Roland Garros and Wimbledon in 2009.
At the end of 2009 it was believed that Nadal was headed for retirement.
Instead, Nadal won 3 slams in 2010, becoming the only man ever to win slams on clay, grass and hardcourt in a Calendar Year.
At the end of 2010 it was believed that Nadal would continue to rule the world.
Instead, Djokovic won 3 slams in 2011.
At the end of 2011 it was believed that Djokovic would continue to dominate the slams.
Instead, we had 4 different slam winners, and Djokovic's Australian Open win was the closest slam final of the year.