View Single Post
Old 11-15-2012, 04:28 AM   #14
joeri888
G.O.A.T.
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 13,065
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RAFA2005RG View Post
The problem with your post is....Talk Tennis has ALWAYS been "sure" yet has a history of never being able to predict what happens each year.

At the end of 2007 it was believed that Federer would continue to dominate. Instead, Nadal won Roland Garros, Wimbledon and Olympic Gold in 2008.

At the end of 2008 it was believed that Nadal would continue to dominate.
Instead, Federer won Roland Garros and Wimbledon in 2009.

At the end of 2009 it was believed that Nadal was headed for retirement.
Instead, Nadal won 3 slams in 2010, becoming the only man ever to win slams on clay, grass and hardcourt in a Calendar Year.

At the end of 2010 it was believed that Nadal would continue to rule the world.
Instead, Djokovic won 3 slams in 2011.

At the end of 2011 it was believed that Djokovic would continue to dominate the slams.
Instead, we had 4 different slam winners, and Djokovic's Australian Open win was the closest slam final of the year.
This is all true. That's why just like the *******s and Rafa haters out there, you should cut the 'Fed is done' 'stick a fork in Roger' BS, as well. We just don't know what will happen next year. Both are extremely talented and both have proved to be able to perform great after disappointments. Wouldn't write off either to win a Slam or more next year, though a really dominant year for Fed is hard to imagine given his age.
joeri888 is offline   Reply With Quote