Originally Posted by PaulMan
cb, that analogy doesn't make any sense. Her party is not called the straight (or lesbian) party...
I think she's a Republican, who more or less, do not believe in same sex marriage. But there's no way they're barring people because of ideology based on that. For example, look at those two fools who lost their Senate seats, Mourdock and Akin, because of their r@pe/abortion views. The party distanced away from them based on their idiotic public comments but nothing they can do to bar them from the party or continue to run as Republicans...
Anyway, there's no way a declaration of sexual orientation is a requirement of belonging to either party!
okay, I deserve the rotten tomatoes thrown at me, I stand corrected. I have made a bad analogy and I am wrong.