View Single Post
Old 11-19-2012, 08:25 AM   #390
Dan Lobb
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,955
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pc1 View Post
A reasonable ranking but I must add that I do believe that in actual playing strength I believe Laver was still the top player.
It gets tricky in the early 1970's.
Sure in a 3 or 4 round event, or challenge match, Laver was clearly #1 in those years, but in the big one, Wimbledon, Newk was clearly number one, and should probably get the number one unofficially.
Newk once said that tennis should be judged by the majors, because STAMINA was an important aspect of tennis dominance, and seven rounds best-of-five sets was the standard. I believe that even the US Open lowered its standards for a while, accepting best-of-three sets in early rounds for a few years. This was an advantage for the top players.

Last edited by Dan Lobb : 11-19-2012 at 08:28 AM.
Dan Lobb is offline   Reply With Quote