View Single Post
Old 11-21-2012, 03:26 PM   #58
Prisoner of Birth
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,810

Originally Posted by sureshs View Post
Neither Fed nor Nadal orchestrated their meetings on specific surfaces. It just happened. There was no power up above manipulating their meetings.

Talking about my head-to-head with Federer shows that you still haven't understood the meaning of statistically significant sample set. It is precisely for that reason that I warned about it in my previous post. 0 is not a statistically significant number. Both Fed and Nadal have played a large number of tournaments and met a large number of times, for the results to be statistically significant.
The suresh has sure(sh)ly spoken. Davydenko>Nadal!
Prisoner of Birth is offline   Reply With Quote