Originally Posted by Mustard
If you don't think these are bigger victories than Todd Martin at the 1999 Australian Open, then I don't know what to say.
Martin has reached 2 slam finals on hard courts. Sampras has only made it past the quarters once at RG (that semifinal blowout loss to Kafelnikov). Martin on hard courts > Stich or Sampras on clay. Of course Sampras or Stich are better than Martin on every surface probably (Stich vs Martin on hard courts is debateable) but it is comparing Martin on his best surface to them on by far their worst.
Meanwhile you prove yet again (for about the 100000000th time) you are quite stupid and illiterate. I did not say specifically Martin was a bigger win. I said Kafelnikov's biggest win in a slam was either Sampras at the 96 French OR Martin at the 99 Australian, which means arguably it could be either. Neither is an impressive "best ever slam win" for a 2 time slam winner though, so which you consider his biggest ever slam win means diddley squat.