Originally Posted by Bartelby
Cross-examination on a matter of hearsay evidence, very good Mr Mason, but the reality is this is not a court of law so we're bound to accept what he says at face value.
And what he actually says is 'has never abused his racquet' which sounds like we need to treat his statement at face value as a statement of fact.
I just wanted to throw out another option. Sounds like a good kid so probably not.