View Single Post
Old 11-27-2012, 12:53 PM   #16
6-1 6-3 6-0
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 4,661

Originally Posted by DropShotArtist View Post
By that definition W2009 was the most important of all since Federer was aiming for the most important record of all, the slam count title.
Again, that was only about Federer, not about Roddick. If Federer had lost, the result wouldn't have been particularly historic at all, just another American winning a slam, which has happened plenty.
6-1 6-3 6-0 is offline   Reply With Quote