View Single Post
Old 11-27-2012, 02:21 PM   #53
djdannyj25
New User
 
djdannyj25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 97
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NetNinja68 View Post
I almost did not want to look at the review scores, as I knew they would be totally inflated but had to see how inflated. As expected/as usual they were, but at least we're not in the 90's yet. Guess we will save that mark until the next version comes out.
I'll go out on a limb and award the next version a conservative 94 even though it will not even hit the design table for another year or so. Great strategy for selling crap loads of Babolats but not so good for the other manufactures also investing in innovations and selling products through this online marketplace...
Just saying, if I were Wilson, Head, Dunlop, Prince etc, I'd be pretty ticked off by now...
Didn't the Head IG Extreme Pro 2.0 also receive a score of 88?
http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/revi...IGXreview.html

The new Blade 93 received a score of 87.
http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/Revi...D93Review.html

The Yonex VCORE Tour 89 got a score of 86.
http://www.tennis-warehouse.com/Revi...T89Review.html

My point is, ALL OF THE SCORES ARE BEING INFLATED, not just Babolats'. Instead of consistently complaining about reviews, just be thankful that TW makes good reviews in the first place.
djdannyj25 is offline   Reply With Quote