chang is 100th, right ?
@ USO, murray : 1 W, 1 F, 1 SF, chang = 1 F, 2 SF, so murray >> chang @ the USO
@ AO , murray : 2 F, 1 SF, chang = 1 F, 2 SF, so murray > chang @ the AO
@ wimbledon, murray : 1 F, 3 SF, chang = 0 SF, so murray >>>> chang @ wimbledon
@ FO : murray : 1 SF, chang = 1W, 1 F, so chang >>>> murray @ the FO
@ the YEC, murray 3 SFs, chang 1 F, no semis, I'd probably say even there ...
murray has 8 masters, chang 7 masters ..
career titles : chang 34, murray 24 ...
years in the top 10 at year end : chang 7, murray 5
years in top 5 at year end : chang 4, murray 5
murray already has a lot more in his favour ...
so yeah, murray should be in ...
Becker,Edberg and Sampras would baggel him ( federer ) on fast indoor or grass more often than not. - the one and only kiki
Last edited by abmk : 12-01-2012 at 02:20 AM.