Originally Posted by syc23
You could make a case for both Murray and Roddick that had they not been born earlier and coincided with Federer at his peak, Nadal and Djokovic, both Andy's would have collected more slams already.
These 2 could have been mulitple Wimbledon champions if it wasn't for the above guys.
The fact that Murray has had to win his slam the hard way in the Federer/Nadal/Djokovic era is enough to include him in the top 100 already.
Who cares that he won in a tough era. History wants cold facts not opinions and hearsay. Truth is Murray lucked out in unplayably windy conditions. Murray is not even close to Noah or Gaudio yet because they won their slams in decent conditions at least.