Originally Posted by Clarky21
TMF and his ilk can scream from the highest mountain that Nadal wasn't injured when he lost to Soderling at RG in 2009 all they want to. It still doesn't change the fact that in reality he WAS injured there,and then went on to skip Wimby afterwards,even though he was the defending champion. Unless you believe Drakulie's laptop girl bs story, then Nadal was really injured that year.
And he was also injured when he lost to perpetual challenger player Rosol this year at Wimby.
They hate the idea that him being injured had anything to do with Fed winning then and becoming n. 1. So they're in denial.