Originally Posted by sonicare
Six year ends in a row is VASTLY different than 6 years in a row. 6 years in a row would put him at minimum 312 weeks at No.1 and we both know that is not true. Next time, watch what you say because I call people out on their BS.
I actually agree with you though. Sampras' 6 YE #1 are vastly overrated. At times he would just play a lot of tournaments towards the end of the year in order to ensure his ranking, Federer's 237 (or whatever it is) consecutive weeks at number one are a lot more impressive.