Originally Posted by Bobby Jr
If you'd cared to pay any attention at all these past 12 months you'd notice that I've always carefully distinguished players who matter in terms of marketing from those who don't.
But, you chose to miss and/or ignore that significant distinguishing detail, as you have shown yourself prone to doing on many occasions.
Nope, I am just not as good as you are to understand those! You are the marketing God.
Why is Raonic less marketable than Djokovic? Huge potential, Canadian with Euro background... And Nike is left now with Federer and disabled Nadal and....Tomic?
Why was Murray "carefully distinguished" from Djokovic when he was clearly to be to TOP player from the UK (huge market)?
You simply keep omitting to explain your genious view on this, and I asked 15 times...