Originally Posted by Mustard
Even if Sampras had gotten past Federer, I don't think he'd have won the title, because he was playing below his usual Wimbledon standard in 2001. Henman or Ivanisevic would have taken him out.
Sampras was playing at his absolute peak. Go look at his serve stats. He was a 4 time defending champion. It is just that a baby fed in his diapers was too good for a peak sampras. deal with it.
Roger's failures on clay eclipse the totality of Pete's career on clay | Federer, the nephew uncle Toni never had | TTW's official ******* trollhunter