Originally Posted by NadalAgassi
Nadal was already ahead of Borg on clay before this year. His dominance at events like Monte Carlo and Rome had him superior as Borg even with the same # of FO titles.
I thought you said only slams matter? So if Nadal has more tune-ups than Borg on clay that means Nadal is the superior clay player but if Federer has won a few more tune-up grass events than Sampras that does not make Federer superior on grass?
I see double standards!