Originally Posted by cc0509
I thought you said only slams matter? So if Nadal has more tune-ups than Borg on clay that means Nadal is the superior clay player but if Federer has won a few more tune-up grass events than Sampras that does not make Federer superior on grass?
I see double standards!
Grass doesnt even have a Masters, so yes on grass all that matters is Wimbledon. If one is REALLY desperate they could argue Queens as having some value, a 500 event. Even that would be meaningless for Federer though as Federer never even plays Queens, any of his non Wimbledon grass victories are Halle, a 250 event, and yes I would say a 250 event has no value to anyone but a tour journeyman, and is meaningless in discussing GOATs. Are you comparing Halle to Rome or Monte Carlo now, LOL! Always fun to explain simple and obvious things to incredibly stupid people.