View Single Post
Old 12-09-2012, 01:18 AM   #15
Sabratha's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,635

Originally Posted by helloworld View Post
We're talking about baby Nadal here. Of course, Roddick is no match for prime Nadal. Yet, Federer couldn't care to beat any version of Nadal, baby or prime.
Nadal beat Roddick 6-7(6), 6-2, 7-6(6), 6-2, at the 2004 Davis Cup. Nadal was 18 years old at this point, so he was scoring wins over prime Roddick at just 18.

Now hang on about Federer not beating "baby or prime Nadal", he's lost to Federer in 2005 at Miami, although it was an incredibly close match. It's still a win and he still beat Nadal, so that renders that argument null.

He also beat Nadal in 2007 at Hamburg, 2009 in Madrid and this year at Indian Wells. His wins at Wimbledon in 2006 and 2007 count towards the ending tally. Also the fact that Federer has been schooling Nadal at the Tennis Masters Cup every time they've played.
"I rest my case. Federer needs to win 28 slams, twice more than Nadal to be in the same conversation with Sampras." A famous quote from helloworld.
Sabratha is offline   Reply With Quote