View Single Post
Old 12-10-2012, 10:14 AM   #73
usta2050
Rookie
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 373
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mxmx View Post
This is a poor excuse of reverse psychology though. "The shoe is faster, so it has an excuse to wear down?" "It is very durable, so it does not need to be comfortable?" - lame excuses. It seems as if companies are sometimes abusing this...If this was not the case, newer models would actually always improve, and not get worse.
Life is short and some of us choose to enjoy life and buy a pair of shoes for 130 (I can't afford that).

Look on the positive side, if you enjoyed it and it worked well for your game, then Nike has done its job.

130 is still cheap in a sense that you can't make a shoe like that starting from scratch (design, mold, test, finish).
usta2050 is offline   Reply With Quote