View Single Post
Old 12-10-2012, 02:06 PM   #15
Mainad's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Manchester, UK.
Posts: 12,243

Originally Posted by President View Post
How on earth do you come to that conclusion? Henman has 6 GS SF which is very good, but only 1 Masters title (and in Paris, at that). Davydenko has 3 Masters. Henman has 11 titles, Davydenko has 21. Davydenko made 4 GS semis, losing to Federer in 3 of them and a doper (Puerta) in the other one. To top it all off, Davydenko has a WTF title which outstrips anything Henman ever did in his career.
I agree with you that Davydenko was the better overall player. His results in non-Slam tournaments were far superior and he achieved a higher ranking than Henman.

But in Slams, Henman clearly has the advantage. 6 semi-finals beats 4. That is why I think Henman has to be called the best player never to reach a final simply because he was a semi-finalist in Slams more times than anybody else.
Andy Murray: "In front of the cameras I'm a little bit shy. When the cameras are off I'm a different person."
Mainad is offline   Reply With Quote