View Single Post
Old 12-10-2012, 02:06 PM   #15
Mainad's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Manchester, UK.
Posts: 9,023

Originally Posted by President View Post
How on earth do you come to that conclusion? Henman has 6 GS SF which is very good, but only 1 Masters title (and in Paris, at that). Davydenko has 3 Masters. Henman has 11 titles, Davydenko has 21. Davydenko made 4 GS semis, losing to Federer in 3 of them and a doper (Puerta) in the other one. To top it all off, Davydenko has a WTF title which outstrips anything Henman ever did in his career.
I agree with you that Davydenko was the better overall player. His results in non-Slam tournaments were far superior and he achieved a higher ranking than Henman.

But in Slams, Henman clearly has the advantage. 6 semi-finals beats 4. That is why I think Henman has to be called the best player never to reach a final simply because he was a semi-finalist in Slams more times than anybody else.
‘Oh my God, Andy, you look so sexy tonight!' (a text from Rafael Nadal to Andy Murray)
Mainad is offline   Reply With Quote