View Single Post
Old 12-13-2012, 09:30 PM   #291
mandy01
G.O.A.T.
 
mandy01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 11,503
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Order View Post
So you're admitting Fed is better on clay than plexicushion since 3 > 2.
No, I said there isn't much of a difference so as to conclusively prove anything. Learn to read. Clay is clearly Federer's worst surface and he actually started getting consistent results there a couple or so years later than when he actually hit his prime (2006 incidently).

Quote:
And Nadal didn't have 11 titles when he faced Fed at RG in 05.
He had 11 in 2005. It means he was well ready for a major victory that year, regardless of when it came.

Quote:
Those other past players with very good achievements in their teens didn't have to beat Federer in a major.
So?

Quote:
And please highlight the players that have done better than Nadal in their teens in terms of major victories.
Borg? Becker? Sampras?
__________________
Our character is defined ,not by others but by ourselves.Peek into your conscience.It tells you everything.
mandy01 is offline   Reply With Quote