View Single Post
Old 12-13-2012, 09:37 PM   #358
Bartelby
Legend
 
Bartelby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 9,482
Default

I explained why your definition of intention is fundamentally incorrect on numerous occasions, so I haven't ignored anything.

I think that the server and receiver should arrive at a consent agreement in non-officiated matches which could include some sort of right of the receiver to call foot faults if the issue arises.

If the match has no officials there either has to be an absolute right or a negotiated one.

The USTA refused to make foot fault calls an absolute right, whereas line calls are.
Bartelby is offline   Reply With Quote