Originally Posted by mandy01
No, I said there isn't much of a difference so as to conclusively prove anything. Learn to read. Clay is clearly Federer's worst surface and he actually started getting consistent results there a couple or so years later than when he actually hit his prime (2006 incidently).
These people are playing ignorant. In AO twice he lost to the winner in 2008 and 2011 in SF. If Roger had played Rafa in FO SF in 2008 or 2011, he wouldn't have reached RG final either.
In AO, Federer's and Djokovic's ranking ensured that they play in SF instead of Final (2008 and 2011). In FO, Federer's and Nadal's rankings ensured that they play in final (2008 and 2011). Ignoring these things and say that plexicushion is Roger's worst surface is plain stupidity. Clay is clearly Roger's weak surface.