View Single Post
Old 12-16-2012, 07:54 AM   #1566
BobbyOne
Legend
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,495
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dominikk1985 View Post
1. fed: he has the rafa issue and no strong opponents from 04-05 but career slam, longest no.1 and most slams. also probably GOAT in both W (most important slam) and USO. he also continued to win from 08-12 despite facing very strong opponents and not being the youngest guy.

2. laver: most dominant of all despite missing his prime years but I don't reward for "what if" and he did not have very strong opponents

3. pete: a lot of slams plus owned his main rivals. he also had to face a lot of good opponents. but he was just too weak on clay to be considered GOAT. no career slam

4.borg: very dominant and could have won more if not his early retirement and AO skipping. but again no what ifs so he is 4th

5. rafa: 11 slams plus owning the GOAT on clay. their h2h is skewed but even baby nadal could keep up with prime fed on every surface. however not good enough in the AO and USO to be considerd higher. career slam is nice but just one title each is a little thin. he is behind borg because borg dominated two slams vs rafas 1

6.connors: most tournaments won and very long no.1 and also missed some more slams because of AO skipping. however he did not have the best opponents (laver was old and borg not yet there), when borg took over he beat connors most of the time (especially 79-81 when connors did not win a single match)

7.from here it becomes tough. I go with lendl at 7

8.I go with macenroe since agassi was owned so much by pete

9.agassi: career slam and very long and successsfull career although he was owned by sampras

10. djokovic: not the most slams but he had to face a slightly past prime fed and prime nadal as probably the best opposition ever. murray is not bad either.
dominikk1985,

Interesting list. You seem to ignore the outcast pros and generally the older times (Tilden!). That's a mistake. It's not a case of "what if". They did have their majors and you should include them in your speculations.

Connors is not this who won the most tournaments. Laver was it by winning at least 200 events!

Laver had very strong opposition!!

A top ten list without Rosewall and Gonzalez is a bad list though.

Last edited by BobbyOne : 12-16-2012 at 08:08 AM.
BobbyOne is offline   Reply With Quote