View Single Post
Old 12-16-2012, 08:48 AM   #1568
Talk Tennis Guru
TMF's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 20,775

Originally Posted by Mustard View Post
Are you being serious? When Tilden was the best amateur player, he was the best player in the world. Emerson was behind the best professional players in the 1960s.
Tilden was the best player on the amateur tour but Emerson was also the best player in the amateur. Tilden turned pro only a few years after the pro tour was established, and there's only a handful of players in the 30s. There isn't much to brag about him being #1 during the pro because there wasn't much competition(lol). Whereas Emerson would have a much tougher time had he turned pro when the field was much deeper/stronger in the 60s.

I normally don't agree with Dan but this time he's 100% correct. Listing number of titles doesn't say about the weight of individual achievement. Because in that case, (Connors, Lendl) > (Federer, Sampras, Borg, Nadal) simply because they have more single titles. Makes no sense.
Thereís a lesson here for every tennis umpire: donít upset Rafael Nadal.
Especially if his shorts are on backward.
TMF is offline   Reply With Quote