Originally Posted by Tagg
i think you need to look up what rivalry means
Competition for the same objective or for superiority in the same field.
people like federer, von cristenberg, schaller, and whoever else sampras played once and lost (or played once and beat) to are not his rivals
not sure why you can't grasp this
it's like calling rosol a rival of nadal. he just isn't
you're clinging to the fact that federer beat sampras once, not sure why
Fed and Sampras played at least four matches against each other. Advantage to Fed. (3 to 1)