View Single Post
Old 12-26-2012, 01:17 PM   #141
Hall Of Fame
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,540

Originally Posted by chatt_town View Post
No doubt she is clearly a top 5 player. I think Martina was the only one better because she excelled so much and in all 3 different phases(singles, doubles and mixed) and she did it for so long.
Out of interest, why, wen comparing men's greats, do we generally only look at singles achievements?

Yet, when looking at the women's game, people always feel the need to bring up the fact that Martina Navratilova excelled at doubles as well?

IMHO, it's close to irrelevant for her ranking.
Sloane Stephens and Laura Robson: future WTA world No 1 and 2.
Phoenix1983 is offline   Reply With Quote