View Single Post
Old 12-26-2012, 03:19 PM   #37
Hannah19
Professional
 
Hannah19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: the Netherlands
Posts: 989
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by retrowagen View Post
I know Lob-Ster started as a manufacturer of ball machines, and diversified into tennis racquets briefly circa 1983-1987. Wasn't MatchMate a big manufacturer of ball machines or nets, or court equipment of some sort, before also making the leap into graphite racquet manufacture before then bowing out? When composite technology caught on, it was a madhouse with lots of "better mousetraps" coming from the freedom brought with the new material and manufacturing technology. Unfortunately, Prince Manufacturing held the patent to the headsize spectrum, so everybody had to license and pay royalties to Howard Head. That guy was a wickedly shrewd businessman! Of course, these smaller companies seldom could afford advertising, or giving sponsorships, and distribution was often quite sparse. At the same time, the bigger companies could afford more money for R&D for more favorable profit/overhead per unit, and pump in the money for advertising and sponsorship to get the name known and desired.

Even technically interesting and decent-playing frames like the Sceptre were doomed from the start.
I have a Kneissl Aero...35 or something like that, that has several "Prince" patents incorporated but it's not an Oversized frame....wonder what those patents are..
__________________
2x MAX 200G PRO, Nat.Gut/Ferry Force Super Touch at 58 lbs.
Hannah19 is offline   Reply With Quote