View Single Post
Old 12-27-2012, 10:39 AM   #51
Talk Tennis Guru
TMF's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 20,686

Originally Posted by forzamilan90 View Post
You get a lot of crap from certain members sometimes for your statements regarding Fed, but in the above paragraph I think you gave a great defense of his game and are completely spot on. It's true, his game would often get scrutinized and analyzed against this one particular player match up on slower and high bouncing surfaces (news flash current terrain favors the grinders), but not as a whole. Full flight Fed's weapons are unstoppable. He's got the whole package.
And they also say Fed benefitted from a modern racquet and string. Yeah, so much benefit for having to deal with constant barrage with tremendous topspin, fast pace, and devastating serve by his peers. Players in the old days with the wooden racquet never had to deal with these onslaught. It's true that their racquet with a smaller head is not as effective as the modern racquet, but the game was slow, there's much less action on the ball, not much imposing.

Mastering the modern racquet is harder than the old racquet, especially for a player with a 1 handed bh. The 1 handed bh rallies from the baseline was never tested as great as today. To be honest, I don't believe Rosewall's 1 handed bh would be as effective as it was in the 60s, and he probably settle to play 2 handed.
TMF is online now   Reply With Quote